Comments on: Functional Splits: the foundation of an Open 5G RAN https://www.5gtechnologyworld.com/functional-splits-the-foundation-of-an-open-5g-ran/ Covering 5G technology, systems, infrastructure and wireless design and development. Tue, 09 May 2023 15:39:53 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.4 By: Xuan Du https://www.5gtechnologyworld.com/functional-splits-the-foundation-of-an-open-5g-ran/#comment-36250 Tue, 09 May 2023 15:39:53 +0000 https://www.5gtechnologyworld.com/?p=17409#comment-36250 Thanks for the article. Is the PDCP supposed to be a layer 2 function in figure 2?

]]>
By: Suvesh Chattopadhyaya https://www.5gtechnologyworld.com/functional-splits-the-foundation-of-an-open-5g-ran/#comment-23444 Sat, 30 Jul 2022 11:55:45 +0000 https://www.5gtechnologyworld.com/?p=17409#comment-23444 Excellent article. Lucid, crisp and to the point. Satisfying learning experience on 3GPP functional splits.

]]>
By: Olli Andersson https://www.5gtechnologyworld.com/functional-splits-the-foundation-of-an-open-5g-ran/#comment-20156 Thu, 26 May 2022 14:28:35 +0000 https://www.5gtechnologyworld.com/?p=17409#comment-20156 In reply to Behnam.

Hi Behnam, the standards provide flexibility how the splits can be implemented by different vendors. In reality, many of the CU/DU vendors cover multiple split options inside their software.

]]>
By: Behnam https://www.5gtechnologyworld.com/functional-splits-the-foundation-of-an-open-5g-ran/#comment-19721 Tue, 17 May 2022 11:01:33 +0000 https://www.5gtechnologyworld.com/?p=17409#comment-19721 Is there any standardization reference supporting/discussing multiple splits per unit (e.g., DU unit)?

]]>
By: Martin Rowe https://www.5gtechnologyworld.com/functional-splits-the-foundation-of-an-open-5g-ran/#comment-18096 Fri, 01 Apr 2022 20:40:03 +0000 https://www.5gtechnologyworld.com/?p=17409#comment-18096 In reply to Steve Wines.

Typo has been corrected.

]]>
By: Olli Andersson https://www.5gtechnologyworld.com/functional-splits-the-foundation-of-an-open-5g-ran/#comment-18095 Fri, 01 Apr 2022 20:33:15 +0000 https://www.5gtechnologyworld.com/?p=17409#comment-18095 In reply to Steve Wines.

You are correct Steve! That was a typo that should now be corrected. Thanks for reading the article carefully through – appreciate the feedback!

]]>
By: Steve Wines https://www.5gtechnologyworld.com/functional-splits-the-foundation-of-an-open-5g-ran/#comment-17823 Tue, 22 Mar 2022 10:56:00 +0000 https://www.5gtechnologyworld.com/?p=17409#comment-17823 Good article Olli – catch the important points in a neutral and simple way. Typo here though ‘The fronthaul network demands of functional split 8 are, however, much simpler because’ – should be option 1?

]]>
By: SM https://www.5gtechnologyworld.com/functional-splits-the-foundation-of-an-open-5g-ran/#comment-13586 Mon, 06 Dec 2021 09:06:15 +0000 https://www.5gtechnologyworld.com/?p=17409#comment-13586 Excellent article. Lucid, crisp and to the point.

]]>
By: Mike Venter https://www.5gtechnologyworld.com/functional-splits-the-foundation-of-an-open-5g-ran/#comment-9765 Mon, 11 Oct 2021 15:35:05 +0000 https://www.5gtechnologyworld.com/?p=17409#comment-9765 Good article and overview of the functional splits

]]>